LOL...and their definition of disturbing is probably quite different to mine, although a discussion about underwear could get quite disturbing I suppose...
It was PG-13 sexuality because it looked tame enough, but what was implied was the juicy part. I wonder if it was because it was a woman director? Eg. it wouldn't gross my parents out if they saw it.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
zvi and
no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 01:37 am (UTC)I must be watching the wrong kind of PG13 movies...LOL
no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 01:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 01:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 01:03 am (UTC)It was good, it made me cry.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 02:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 02:44 am (UTC)