kamomil: (Default)
kamomil ([personal profile] kamomil) wrote2007-03-15 04:04 pm

(no subject)

I want to see this.

The Namesake

[identity profile] gabbytheguy.livejournal.com 2007-03-16 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
Since when did movies get "Rated PG-13 for sexuality/nudity, a scene of drug use, some disturbing images and brief language."?

I must be watching the wrong kind of PG13 movies...LOL

[identity profile] kamomil.livejournal.com 2007-03-16 01:42 am (UTC)(link)
brief language? they don't speak for very long? or they discuss underwear?

[identity profile] gabbytheguy.livejournal.com 2007-03-16 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
LOL...and their definition of disturbing is probably quite different to mine, although a discussion about underwear could get quite disturbing I suppose...

[identity profile] kamomil.livejournal.com 2007-03-17 01:03 am (UTC)(link)
A train wreck, a couple of rolls in the hay, and a couple of joints smoked... no biggie.

It was good, it made me cry.

[identity profile] kamomil.livejournal.com 2007-03-17 02:03 am (UTC)(link)
It was PG-13 sexuality because it looked tame enough, but what was implied was the juicy part. I wonder if it was because it was a woman director? Eg. it wouldn't gross my parents out if they saw it.

[identity profile] gabbytheguy.livejournal.com 2007-03-17 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
What would be your definition of a biggie?! ;p