LOL...and their definition of disturbing is probably quite different to mine, although a discussion about underwear could get quite disturbing I suppose...
It was PG-13 sexuality because it looked tame enough, but what was implied was the juicy part. I wonder if it was because it was a woman director? Eg. it wouldn't gross my parents out if they saw it.
no subject
I must be watching the wrong kind of PG13 movies...LOL
no subject
no subject
no subject
It was good, it made me cry.
no subject
no subject